On Psychic Claims, Discernment, and Media Responsibility

 

In times of uncertainty, many people turn to psychics and spiritual figures for guidance. But this raises an important question that deserves honest reflection:

Can a psychic who consistently delivers negative or apocalyptic visions be considered trustworthy?

From my spiritual perspective, not necessarily.

True intuition is not fueled by fear. Genuine spiritual perception carries balance, clarity, and compassion. It recognizes possibilities, not fixed or unavoidable outcomes. Authentic insight understands that the future is fluid—shaped by consciousness, choice, and collective action, not sealed by doom.

Psychic ability alone does not guarantee truth or wisdom. Spiritual awareness must be grounded in discernment, ethics, and emotional responsibility. When messages focus solely on catastrophe, despair, or inevitability, they often strip people of agency rather than empower them. Spiritual insight, at its core, should awaken awareness—not create paralysis, panic, or helplessness.

This is where media responsibility becomes crucial.

Programs like Kapuso Mo, Jessica Soho, which reach millions of viewers, carry significant influence. Featuring fear-driven psychic narratives without proper context, grounding, or critical framing risks amplifying public anxiety and normalizing misinformation. Spiritual topics deserve depth and responsibility—not sensationalism.

Spirituality is not about predicting disaster.

It is about cultivating awareness, resilience, and conscious choice.

Discernment, therefore, is essential—not only for those who claim spiritual gifts, but also for the platforms that choose to amplify their voices. When spirituality is shared responsibly, it becomes a tool for empowerment, healing, and clarity—not fear.